Ever since roulette first appeared on the floors of gambling houses, players have been trying to devise methods that would allow them to beat the Devil’s Wheel. This never-ending quest to prevail over the house has led to the emergence of numerous roulette systems, most of which are based on either negative or positive betting progressions.
Progressive systems have proved to be extremely popular among roulette players, a fact that can be attributed to two main reasons. First, most of them rely on a relatively simple set of rules, enabling players to incorporate them into their gaming sessions without much difficulty.
Second, progressive systems give gamblers the deceptive impression that they work when they actually don’t, or at least not over the long term. You may generate some profits occasionally, but the fact of the matter is that such systems have zero influence on your odds of winning in the long run.
In light of this, we will delve deeper into the most popular progressive roulette systems, explaining how they work and why they inevitably prove ineffective. By the time you finish reading, you will have a better understanding of progressive betting, allowing you to decide for yourself whether you should use this method.
A Few Words on the Concept of the Gambler's Fallacy
1The Concept
Before we proceed with further explanations of progressive systems, we would like to say a few words about a concept known as the Gambler’s Fallacy. Also called the Fallacy of the Maturity of Chances, it stems from a cognitive bias in which a person mistakenly believes that if a random event occurs more frequently during a short period, it will occur less frequently in the future.
In roulette (a random game based on independent events), this means a player may feel the ball is due to land on black because red has appeared several times in a row. The most notorious instance in which this inference proved wrong occurred in August 1913 at the Monte Carlo Casino, which is why the bias is sometimes referred to as the Monte Carlo Fallacy.
Millions were lost that night when the ball landed on black 26 times in a row – an extremely rare occurrence (1 in 66.6 million). Gamblers stubbornly continued to bet on red, assuming it was “due” because the long sequence of black outcomes had created an imbalance in the wheel.
2Streaks
Interestingly, the Gambler’s Fallacy can also manifest in reverse. It occurs when a player assumes that black is more likely on the next spin after the ball has landed in black pockets several times in a row. This reasoning stems from gamblers’ belief in streaks.
However, this line of thinking is equally flawed, especially when one is playing on a balanced wheel that produces completely random results and shows no bias toward specific numbers or sections. In such a “fair” game of roulette, each outcome is entirely independent of the previous ones.
3Patterns
Moreover, streaks have no impact on future spins. Roulette is based on independent trials; therefore, red and black are always equally probable (each has 18 winning pockets against 19 losing ones on a wheel with one zero). Humans are inclined to look for short-term patterns, but these cannot be trusted, even though our brains try hard to convince us otherwise.
Many roulette players fall prey to the Gambler’s Fallacy because they believe they have identified a short-term pattern that will help them beat the game. They use betting progressions because they do not think a streak can last long enough to harm their chances. Unfortunately, this belief often leads to disastrous financial results.
- High Stakes Roulette
- Low Limit Roulette
- Fibonacci Roulette System
- Parlay Roulette System
- Martingale Roulette System
- Inside Bets
- Outside Bets
- Roulette Rules
- Roulette Strategies
- American Roulette
- French Roulette
- European Roulette
- American and European Wheel Sequences
- Roulette – From a Perpetual Motion Machine to a Casino Landmark
- Roulette Basics and Rules of Table Conduct
- Roulette's Bet Types
- The French Roulette Layout
- Independent Trials, Odds, and Casino Edge in Roulette
- En Prison and La Partage
- Taking Your Roulette Game to the Next Level with Call Bets
- The Many Faces of Roulette – Interesting Variations to Try
- Reading Biased Wheels and Other Predictive Methods
- The Master of the Wheel Gonzalo Garcia Pelayo
- Improving Your Roulette Game
- Dispelling Roulette Myths
- How to Protect a Roulette Bankroll
- Software Providers of Online Roulette
- Roulette Games with Progressive Jackpots
- Live Dealer Roulette
- Roulette Goes Mobile
- Roulette in Literature, Film, and Television
Key Principles of Positive and Negative Roulette Progressions
The two most common types of roulette systems are based either on positive or on negative betting progressions. Both types of systems rely on previous outcomes to determine the amount the player bets on subsequent spins. The exact bet sizing depends on the type of system one uses and whether it is based on a positive or a negative progression.

Positive progression systems like the Paroli require the player to increase their stake after a winning round and reduce it after a loss occurs. These are less damaging than negative progression systems.

Negative progression systems work in the opposite manner as they require you to increase your wager after a losing spin and decrease it after you register a win. Exactly how you adjust the wagers after losing depends on the particular progression you use.

Their primary purpose is to help gamblers win more and capitalize on winning streaks. A positive progressive system can earn you decent profits during a long favorable streak and is less likely to destroy your bankroll during a losing one. Despite this, it has no impact on your overall odds of winning or losing a bet.

Some negative systems like the Fibonacci rely on extremely steep progressions. If you are playing on a shoestring budget, they can wipe out your session bankroll in several consecutive losses only.

The main premise behind negative progressions is they help the player recover their losses during a long bad streak. Here you are not trying to boost your profits but are aiming at diminishing your losses instead. Let's now delve into some of the most popular negative progression systems for roulette, starting with the infamous Martingale.
The Most Popular Roulette Systems
Martingale - The King of Betting Progressions
The Fibonacci – How Nature's Code is Used at the Roulette Table
Henry Labouchere's Contribution to Progressive Systems
On the Positive Side of Things – The Paroli
D'Alembert and the Theory of Equilibrium
Oscar's Grind – A Simple SystemMartingale - The King of Betting Progressions
The Martingale is easily the most popular strategy among gamblers and is used in games like roulette, blackjack, craps, and baccarat. It is not clear who exactly devised the system, although some sources suggest it was named after the 17th-century casino owner Henry Martindale. Its pronunciation gradually changed over time.
This is a negative progressive system in which you double your stake after each loss and revert to your base unit after a win. It can be applied to all types of roulette bets, but it is mostly used for even-money propositions such as red/black, even/odd, and high/low. Players can choose any base-unit size they prefer, although smaller units are advisable.
Let’s see how the Martingale works with an example from roulette. Suppose you decide to use $10 as your base unit and bet on black. If black lands, you continue betting $10 until a loss occurs. When red appears and you lose your $10, you double the next wager to $20. If red comes again, you raise your following stake to $40. Should another loss occur, your next bet should be $80, and so on.
| Stake | Outcome | Profit |
|---|---|---|
| $10 on black | Black/Win | $10 |
| $10 on red | Black/Loss | -$10 |
| $20 on red | Black/Loss | -$30 |
| $40 on black | Red/Loss | -$70 |
| $80 on red | Red/Win | $10 |
The idea is that you will eventually register a win, which will offset your previous losses and leave you with a profit equal to your base bet unit – $10 in this instance. Regardless of how many losses you incur in a row and what base-unit size you use, you will win exactly the amount you staked on the first spin.
The Martingale can yield positive results in the short term, but there is no way to know with certainty when a losing streak will end. Six or seven consecutive losing spins are not at all improbable in roulette.
Because the bet size rises rapidly with the Martingale, a longer losing streak can either wipe out your bankroll or cause you to reach the table limits, preventing you from continuing the progression. Ultimately, you risk large amounts just to offset your losses and end up with only one base unit of profit.
The Fibonacci – How Nature's Code is Used at the Roulette Table
The Fibonacci sequence was first recorded by Italian mathematician Leonardo Pisano Bigollo (also known as Leonardo of Pisa or simply Fibonacci). In his 1202 book Liber Abaci, he described a series of numbers whose influence extends far beyond mathematics. Often called “Nature’s Code,” this sequence can be found throughout nature and even in the arts.
It runs as follows: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 510, and so on. Each subsequent number equals the sum of the two numbers that precede it, a process that can continue indefinitely. So how is it used in roulette, and for what purpose?
In gambling, the Fibonacci is a negative progressive system where the player increases their stake after each loss, following the famous sequence. When a win is registered, the bettor moves two numbers back in the sequence. If the very first wager wins, you continue flat-betting your base unit until a loss eventually occurs, which then calls for a bet increase.
The zero is ignored here, so the sequence becomes 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, and so on. The system is mainly used for outside propositions in roulette and pass-line wagers in the dice game of craps. Here is how the Fibonacci is applied in practice when you start with a base unit of $10:
| Stake | Outcome | Profit |
|---|---|---|
| $10 on odd | 32 red hits/Loss | -$10 |
| $10 on odd | 10 black hits/Loss | -$20 |
| $20 on odd | 12 red hits/Loss | -$40 |
| $30 on even | 33 black hits/Loss | -$70 |
| $50 on red | 24 black hits/Loss | -$120 |
| $80 on black | 9 red hits/Loss | -$200 |
| $130 on black | 22 black hits/Win | -$70 |
| $50 on red | 9 red hits/Win | -$20 |
It is clear that this system has a much steeper betting progression than the Martingale, so the player inevitably puts large sums at risk if a prolonged losing streak occurs. The Fibonacci is suitable for players who have sizable bankrolls and are comfortable with the high level of risk involved.
Henry Labouchere's Contribution to Progressive Systems
The Labouchere system was devised by avid gambler Henry Labouchere, who applied it specifically to the game of roulette. Also known as the Cancellation Method or the Split Martingale, its original conception is sometimes attributed to the French mathematician and philosopher Marquis de Condorcet.
This is a negative progressive system that stands out for its higher level of complexity, so keep a pen and notepad handy if you decide to use it. Like other strategies, it is employed predominantly for even-money propositions in roulette. You begin by writing down a sequence of positive numbers. Choose the sequence carefully, because your potential profit equals the total of the numbers you list.
For example, take the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, with each number representing the units you will stake. In this case, your projected winnings amount to 15 units. We will use $1 as the base unit, but you can select any amount you find comfortable.
Your first wager should equal the sum of the first (1) and last (5) numbers in the sequence – in this case, $6. Each time you suffer a loss, you add the amount of the losing wager to the end of the sequence.
If you lose on the very first round, your sequence becomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and your next bet is $7. Should you win this time, you end up with a net profit of one base unit, or $1.
Whenever your wager wins, you cross out the first and last numbers in the sequence – 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 – and bet the sum of the first and last uncrossed numbers, or $7 (2+5). If you win again, your sequence becomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. You then stake 7 units (3+4) or another $7. A betting cycle ends successfully when you have crossed out all numbers in your sequence.
| Sequence | Stake with Base Unit of $1 | Outcome | Profits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | $6 (1+5) | Loss | -$6 |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | $7 (1+6) | Win | $1 |
| 2, 3, 4, 5 | $7 (2+5) | Win | $8 |
| 3, 4 | $7 (3+4) | Loss | $1 |
| 3, 4, 7 | $10 (3+7) | Loss | -$9 |
| 3, 4, 7, 10 | $13 (3+10) | Win | $4 |
| 4, 7 | $11 (4+7) | Win | $15 in profit for this cycle |
Remember, the longer your sequence is, the more money you must bring to the roulette table. If you hit an extended losing streak, you will keep adding numbers to the sequence until you either exhaust your session bankroll or reach the table maximum.
Many roulette players who use the Labouchere decide in advance how many units they want to win and then select a sequence of numbers whose total equals that amount. For instance, if your goal is 20 units, you might use a sequence such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5.
On the Positive Side of Things – The Paroli
So far, we have covered only roulette systems that rely on negative betting progressions. The Paroli is different because it is based on a positive progression, meaning you increase your stakes when you win and cut them back after you lose. Accordingly, this approach focuses on maximizing profits rather than controlling losses.
The word “paroli” comes from the Latin “par,” which means “match.” The system is essentially the opposite of the infamous Martingale, but it sets limits on the player’s maximum bet. It is intended for even-money bets in games such as roulette, baccarat, craps, and blackjack.
You begin by choosing a fixed base-bet unit that is proportionate to your session bankroll. For instance, if you allocate $400 or $500 per session, your fixed unit should be no more than $10. Each time you win, you double your bet for the next round. If your first wager of $10 wins, you stake $20 on the next spin; win again and your following bet is $40.
The difference is that this doubling does not continue indefinitely. It stops once you score three consecutive wins, after which you drop back to your base unit. If a loss occurs at any point, you immediately revert to the base bet and continue to flat-bet that amount until you win.
| Stake with Base Unit of $10 | Outcome | Net Profit |
|---|---|---|
| $10 on red | 26 black/Loss | -$10 |
| $10 on red | 9 red/Win | $0 (break even) |
| $20 on black | 15 black/Win | $20 |
| $40 on even | 12 red/Win | $60 |
| $10 on black | 23 red/Loss | $50 |
| $10 on a high number (19-36) | 3 red, low/Loss | $40 |
The Paroli offers several short-term advantages. First, it prevents you from chasing your losses with progressively larger wagers during a bad run. Second, it helps you generate small but consistent profits. Third, it caps your maximum stake, reducing the amount of money you expose to risk.
D'Alembert and the Theory of Equilibrium
The D’Alembert system is named after the French mathematician, music theorist, and physicist Jean le Rond D’Alembert, who introduced a concept known as the Theory of Equilibrium. In his 1754 article “Croix ou Pile,” D’Alembert claimed that the probability of a coin toss producing heads increases with each consecutive tails outcome.
Sounds familiar, right? As brilliant as this French mathematician was, he nonetheless succumbed to the Gambler’s Fallacy. The probabilities of a fair coin are not affected by previous results, yet gamblers still devised an entire betting system based on D’Alembert’s mistaken notion.
The D’Alembert is a negative progressive system that relies on the idea of equilibrium – that is, the player will lose roughly the same number of even-money propositions as they win. In other words, red, odd, and low outcomes are expected to appear about as often as black, even, and high outcomes during a betting session.
The system is straightforward and easy to use in roulette. You start with a stake of one base unit and increase your bet by one unit after each consecutive loss. Thus, if you begin with a base unit of $10 and lose, your next stake is $20. If you lose again, the following wager should be $30, and so on.
This continues until a win occurs, at which point the next wager is reduced by one base unit. If you win on your very first spin, you keep flat-betting the base unit until you lose, then increase the subsequent wager.
| Stake with a Base Unit of $10 | Outcome | Profits |
|---|---|---|
| $10 on red | 17 black/Loss | -$10 |
| $20 on black | 18 red/Loss | -$30 |
| $30 on black | 21 red/Loss | -$60 |
| $40 on red | 34 red/Win | -$20 |
| $30 on even | 28 even/Win | $10 |
| $20 on red | 12 red/Win | $30 |
| $10 on high | 5 red, low/Loss | $20 |
You can secure profits with the D’Alembert provided that you win roughly the same number of bets as you lose. Because the winning bets are placed at higher stakes than the losing ones, this balance can potentially leave you ahead at the end of the session.
However, there is no guarantee that such equilibrium will occur during any given session in the short term. A prolonged losing streak can eat up your bankroll with the D’Alembert, despite its gentler negative progression.
Oscar's Grind – A Simple System
The Oscar’s Grind system first gained prominence after the publication of The Casino Gambler’s Guide by Allan Wilson. It is based on a positive betting progression in which you increase your stake by one base unit after each win but wager the same amount when you lose. Ideally, this yields a profit of one base unit at the end of each betting cycle. The guiding principle is that the player never risks more money than is necessary to recover previous losses and secure a profit of a single unit. Here is how Oscar’s Grind works in practice:
| Stake with Base Unit of $10 | Outcome | Net Profits |
|---|---|---|
| $10 on even | 35 black/Loss | -$10 |
| $10 on black | 14 red/Loss | -$20 |
| $10 on red | 6 black/Loss | -$30 |
| $10 on red | 9 red/Win | -$20 |
| $20 on black | 10 black/Win | $0 (you break even) |
| $10 on red | 20 black/Loss | -$10 |
| $10 on red | 30 red/Win | $0 |
| $10 on black | 11 black/Win | $10 |
In this example, the player recoups prior losses and finishes with a profit of exactly one unit. If they choose to continue playing, they should begin a new cycle at the first level with one base unit.
Where Progressive Roulette Systems Fall Flat
1No impact on the odds
Progressive roulette systems fall flat for several reasons, beginning with the fact that bet-size adjustments are based on previous results. These systems have no effect on a player’s odds of winning, which stay the same for every spin of the wheel. Each number has the same chance of hitting in any round as every other number. How many times you have won or lost in previous rounds is irrelevant to the wheel.
2The House Edge
Furthermore, using a progressive system does nothing to reduce the house edge. Every bet you place, no matter how big or small, is subject to the same casino advantage (2.70% in European roulette and 5.26% in American roulette). No matter how cleverly you size your wagers, your profits will never be enough to overcome that edge.
3Computer Simulations
Most systems built on this principle may perform well in the short term but prove useless over time. Experts have tested popular betting progressions like those described above using computer simulations, and the outcome has always been the same over millions of trials: the ratio of money lost to money wagered matches that of flat betting because of the house edge.
Some proponents of betting progressions argue that no one can play millions of rounds in a real casino. They swear by their systems, claiming they fare poorly in computer simulations but would work flawlessly in “real life.”
Unfortunately, this excuse carries no mathematical weight. Simulations run millions of rounds simply to demonstrate a system’s flaws. If the strategy performs poorly on a computer, there is no reason to expect it to produce positive results in an actual casino environment.
4Bad run
There are two additional problems with system play, especially when you use a negative progression to size your bets. What happens if you are under-bankrolled or are seated at a table with a low maximum limit?
In the first scenario, a devastating losing streak (not uncommon in roulette) can completely wipe out your bankroll. You will be unable to continue the progression and will fail to recoup your heavy losses. The same issue arises with the table maximum. When you reach it during a bad run, you cannot offset your prior losses, even if you have more money to keep increasing your bets according to the negative system.